4 ms·
Ah, I suppose the WSJ is reddit-type reactionary too? Maybe it is useful having them repeat this story so people with (different) ideological biases can perceiv
by superkuh 1y ago
Ah, I suppose the WSJ is reddit-type reactionary too? Maybe it is useful having them repeat this story so people with (different) ideological biases can perceive it without discomfort on hearing Doctorow's name.
- floundy 1y agoI just left a parent comment poking holes in the WSJ article, too. The author of the WSJ article, Patrick Thomas, is also a journalist, not an economist.
- dpkirchner 1y agoYou kinda just said "nuh-uh" at the WSJ article without providing any counter-evidence. I wouldn't call that poking holes, IMO.