4 ms·
I believe it; it's like the first decade or two of low-flow / flush toilets which were generally just terrible and ineffective. Hopefully, like the toilets, a
by mjevans 1y ago
I believe it; it's like the first decade or two of low-flow / flush toilets which were generally just terrible and ineffective.
Hopefully, like the toilets, a new standard rises that is based around how effective something is at it's primary job _first_, with efficiency in other areas then measured after completing the intended task.
- detourdog 1y agoThat is where I expect care in product development. A standard is a number to hit and if a manufacturer takes care in their work the consumer should experience no degradation in quality.
- leereeves 1y agoWell said. I have one of those "low-flush" toilets. I have to flush it twice, so I end up using more water than a regular toilet.
- morsch 1y agoLooking at the averages, that's still less water.
- nothercastle 1y agoThe appliance industry found a hack to prevent or at least greatly delay consumers rejecting bad products by creating thousands of skus for nearly identical products that made identifying lemons nearly impossible. Similar to how Chinese brands on Amazon have the same name for 100 different nearly identical items.
- mcphage 1y ago> thousands of skus for nearly identical products that made identifying lemons nearly impossible Also to prevent price-matching.
- nothercastle 1y agoThat too, tvs do that as well but at least it’s somewhat possible to compare and review them