3 ms·
Yes, but that doesn’t really have anything to do with the number of lexical roots that roughly correspond to English ‘snow’. We wouldn’t say that English has fi
by foldr 1y ago
Yes, but that doesn’t really have anything to do with the number of lexical roots that roughly correspond to English ‘snow’. We wouldn’t say that English has five words for snow because of ‘snow’, ‘snows’ (plural noun), ‘snows’ (verb), ‘snowed’, ‘snowing’.
- apothegm 1y agoAh, it’s discussing roots rather than words?