3 ms·
I hear you, and I agree. For me, though, some amount of harm is built-in to our condition. We will eat junk sometimes, we will be sedentary sometimes- we migh
by dijit 1y ago
I hear you, and I agree.
For me, though, some amount of harm is built-in to our condition.
We will eat junk sometimes, we will be sedentary sometimes- we might even overindulge sometimes.
For me, marijuana is recreational, like alcohol.
If a recreational session of marijuana is better for humans than a recreational session of alcohol, then I would actively promote that- since we are all keenly aware of how prohibiting all recreational unhealthy things goes in reality. “Perfect is the enemy of good”, in this case I might say that “perfect is the enemy of improvement”; maybe theres a better quote for exactly this.
Knowing that its better on your lungs than smoking, which was socially acceptable 20 years ago, goes a long way to helping.
Though I also agree with other commenters, its a low bar and the frequency of recreational drug use vs casual smoking is an apples to oranges comparison
- zorobo 1y ago> If a recreational session of marijuana is better for humans than a recreational session of alcohol, then I would actively promote that- Well it's not: if someone smokes near me, I am smoking with him. Not so with alcohol.
- btreecat 1y agoSmoking near you, and forcing you to actively consume second hand smoke are not the same. It's bad practice to equate an offensive order with drug consumption.