3 ms·
Sure, but there needs to be some justification or measuring stick to decide what's worth researching and what isn't. Otherwise you're just burning up money and
by yupitsme123 1y ago
Sure, but there needs to be some justification or measuring stick to decide what's worth researching and what isn't. Otherwise you're just burning up money and labor on fruitless tasks.
Reading some of the comments in this thread it sounds like people are in favor of spending any amount of money on researching any topic without any discrimination whatsoever. That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
- TheOtherHobbes 1y agoStrawman. No one is suggesting that. These programs are vetted by people whose job it is to assess realistic returns. It's far more extreme - and far less rational - to assert they're worthless, and therefore need to end, based purely on vibes and ideology. This entire discussion is a 180 from the truth. These programs shouldn't need defending. Whatever the cranks believe, the returns have been proven decade after decade after decade. The people who are axing them are the ones who need to justify themselves, not just economically but constitutionally and morally. So far they've only tried to justify themselves ideologically, which is not even close to being a credible argument.