2 ms·
Woah there, you're making a straw man here but I'll bite. I'll preface it with the fact that I also think types are against the very nature of Ruby as I know an
by phoronixrly 1y ago
Woah there, you're making a straw man here but I'll bite. I'll preface it with the fact that I also think types are against the very nature of Ruby as I know and practice it.
But, why not choose a proprer statically typed language? Because you've inherited a mastodon of a legacy app that started simple, then matured with thick layers of features. How can you wrangle this? Oh just rewrite it in Rust. Or you could seek an iterative approach and introduce tools to help you. Like bolted-on types.
Oh and I'm not sure I follow what all this about the environment is... If one is so conscious about it, maybe choose a different field entirely?