9 ms·
No no, for WaPo one need only know that Bezos spiked the Editorial Board's endorsement of Harris and then Blue Origin executives met with the Trump campaign lit
by sorcerer-mar 1y ago
No no, for WaPo one need only know that Bezos spiked the Editorial Board's endorsement of Harris and then Blue Origin executives met with the Trump campaign literally hours later.
Oh yeah and that they wouldn't publish a cartoon poking fun at the kleptocracy. The artist resigned in protest and went on to win a Pulitzer, which WaPo had no problem taking credit for.
Is it fair to say that Navalny didn't fear Putin because he was actually quite vocal against Putin?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- EnPissant 1y agoI see. So "not enough" then.
- sorcerer-mar 1y agoNope, that's actually not what I said. Nice try though!
- EnPissant 1y agoSo the Washington Post is extremely anti-Trump but once or twice the owner stepped in and forced them to remain neutral _maybe_ so as not to jeopardize government contracts for one of his other companies. But also there was a big backlash, and he probably could never do this again or the very least extremely infrequently?
- sorcerer-mar 1y ago> So the Washington Post… owner stepped in… so as not to jeopardize government contracts for one of his other companies I see. So “in fear of being targeted in retaliation” then?