4 ms·
My thoughts exactly. JSX provides the best templating syntax I have seen - it's just JS, and it uses curly braces to delineate JS. Putting JS, or worse, custom
by kakuri 1y ago
My thoughts exactly. JSX provides the best templating syntax I have seen - it's just JS, and it uses curly braces to delineate JS. Putting JS, or worse, custom syntax in strings is terrible, and every other delineator choice is less idiomatic and uglier than curly braces.
- silverwind 1y agoJSX is good but still has room for improvement: - Original HTML attribute names, `class` instead of `className`, `for` instead of `htmlFor` - Let expressions and components return multiple elements without the need for `Fragment`. Could make a JSX 2.0 which would be much closer to actual HTML.
- chris_pie 1y agoattribute names depend on the implementation, Solid uses JSX and `class`
- owebmaster 1y agohave you tried lit-html?