3 ms·

I see that it’s time to link this again: <https://geekfeminism.fandom.com/wiki/Who_is_harmed_by_a_%22Real_Names%22_policy%3F https://geekfeminism.fandom.com/wik

• chrismorgan 1y ago
  That doesn’t invalidate what I said. Anonymity protects both “good” and “bad” people. My argument was just that it doesn’t seem fair to use this case to justify anonymity, when removing anonymity would also probably have solved it. It’s not the conclusion I’m disagreeing with, just the logic. (Perhaps I undermined this aspect by indulging in the thought experiment where accountability was actually held. Do I think such a scheme would actually work well? Not at all. People are involved.)
  • dangus 1y ago
    I wasn't looking to thoroughly justify anonymity, more like a pragmatic reason that it's needed on the current Internet at the individual level.
• dredmorbius 1y ago
  "Sorry! Fandom isn't allowing BreezeWiki to show pages right now." (intermittent) I've attempted to archive the link at both Internet Archive and Archive Today, though both fail to show content.
  • immibis 1y ago
    Putting important information on Fandom is about as useful as putting your restaurant menu on Instagram.
  • teddyh 1y ago
    Seems to work fine: Last succesful archive was made on march 16th: <https://web.archive.org/web/20250316060617/https://geekfeminism.fandom.com/wiki/Who_is_harmed_by_a_%22Real_Names%22_policy%3F https://web.archive.org/web/20250316060617/https://geekfemin...> And I just now added a new one: <https://web.archive.org/web/20250519201255/https://geekfeminism.fandom.com/wiki/Who_is_harmed_by_a_%22Real_Names%22_policy%3F https://web.archive.org/web/20250519201255/https://geekfemin...>