3 ms·
Gemini 2.5 Pro is better at coding than Claude, it’s just not as good at acting agentically, nor does Google have good tooling to support this use case. Given h
by bugglebeetle 1y ago
Gemini 2.5 Pro is better at coding than Claude, it’s just not as good at acting agentically, nor does Google have good tooling to support this use case. Given how quickly they’ve come from far behind and their advantage on context size (Claude’s biggest weakness), this could change just as fast, although I’m skeptical they can deliver a good end user dev tool.
- arunix 1y agoHow much do you pay for Gemini 2.5 Pro?
- childintime 1y agoSomething like $20/month, first 2 months $10. Depends on the country.
- MaxikCZ 1y ago> Gemini 2.5 Pro is better at coding than Claude Id be careful with stating things like these as fact. I asked Gemini for half an hour to write code that draws a graph the way I want, it never got it right. Then I asked Cladue 3.7 and it got it almost right the first try, to the point I thought its compeltely right, and fixed the bug I discovered right after I pointed it out.
- virtualmic 1y agoYup, I have had similar experience too. Not only for coding, but just yesterday, I was asking Gemini to compose an email with a list of attachments, which I had specified as a list of file paths in the prompt, and it wasn't able to count correctly and report in the email text (the text went something like, there are <number_of_attachments> charts attached). Claude 3.7 was able to do that correctly in one go.