I use it, on a large Clojure/ClojureScript application. And it's good. The interactions and results are roughly in line with what I'd expect from a junior inte

I use it, on a large Clojure/ClojureScript application. And it's good. The interactions and results are roughly in line with what I'd expect from a junior intern. E.g. don't expect miracles, the answers will sometimes be wrong, the solutions will be naive, and you have to describe what you need done in detail. The great thing about Claude code is that (as opposed to most other tools) you can start it in a large code base and it will be able to find its way, without me manually "attaching files to context". This is very important, and overlooked in competing solutions. I tried using aider and plandex, and none of them worked as well. After lots of fiddling I could get mediocre results. Claude Code just works, I can start it up and start DOING THINGS. It does best with simple repetitive tasks: add another command line option similar to others, add an API interface to functions similar to other examples, etc. In other words, I'd give it a serious thumbs up: I'd rather work with this than a junior intern, and I have hope for improvement in models in the future.