3 ms·
If you like 'em get one. If you don't like it later, remove it. Sounds good to me. I always take ideas to the extreme to see if they still make sense. It seems
by jmward01 1y ago
If you like 'em get one. If you don't like it later, remove it. Sounds good to me. I always take ideas to the extreme to see if they still make sense. It seems like over time tattoos are becoming less permanent and it isn't inconceivable that they could become exceptionally transient meaning add/remove at will (or even become 'live' interactive displays). Does that change their meaning or value? Some people wear a belt buckle or jewelry for decades because of sentimental value even though they can easily change things. I suspect in a future where this is easy/normal we will see even more variety, expression and meaning.
- BizarroLand 1y agoIf there were microdot e-ink tattoos (whatever their equivalent would be in human machine interface systems, anyway) I would strongly consider getting one. You can do a lot with a 64x64 matrix especially if you can change it with a usb powered overlay device or like a laser at a specific light frequency or something.
- jmward01 1y agoOutput is cool, but I think the input possibilities are pretty high too.