4 ms·

Zed (https://zed.dev/agentic https://zed.dev/agentic) also released agentic code edits (similar to Cursor) which I tried and really like.

WD-42 1y ago
And it's not yet another editor running in a web browser which is really, really nice.
- ramon156 1y ago
  Its fast. Love it !
- muppetman 1y ago
  Doesn't it need to download a massive nodejs binary to be useful?
  - WD-42 1y ago
    For what?
    - TiredOfLife 1y ago
      Just for syntax highlighting no. But for any ide like features it need language servers and some of them are node based. https://zed.dev/docs/languages https://zed.dev/docs/languages
    - muppetman 1y ago
      I dunno, you tell me? https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/12589 https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/12589
      - WD-42 1y ago
        Right. “To be useful” includes leveraging language servers, which they aren’t going to write from scratch. So what’s your point?
- hu3 1y ago
  Clearly. Zed wouldn't have blurry text rendering on some resolutions if they did. Issue has been open for over a year. https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/7992 https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/7992
  - alfiedotwtf 1y ago
    I just wish it had a fallback if Vulcan wasn’t installed… I would love to run Zed inside a docker container so that naughty plugins don’t misbehave
minzi 1y ago
Its agent is a lot worse than Cursor's in my experience so far. Even tab edits feel worse. My understanding is that these are not custom models but a combination of prompting and steering. That makes Cursor's performance relative to others pretty surprising to me. Are they just making more requests? I wonder what the secret sauce is.