5 ms·
You're mixing up "mention" and "use", which makes it very hard to understand which you mean. Maybe what you're trying to say is that it would be outrageous if t
by GHFigs 14y ago
You're mixing up "mention" and "use", which makes it very hard to understand which you mean. Maybe what you're trying to say is that it would be outrageous if they invoked that statue.
- vidarh 14y agoNo. I meant what I wrote. It is outrageous that they are using the law in question as a threat. I'm sure I could have formulated it otherwise, but your suggestion states something different, which implies no condemnation of the action they have already taken: They have already used the law in question as a threat by mentioning it in their letter to the government of Ecuador. Actually making use of it would not merely be outrageous, it would be a violation of international law.