2 ms·
Right, but that implies that spending is controlled by revenues… when it’s clearly not. That just means higher deficits, threatening a default of US Bonds, whic
by scoofy 1y ago
Right, but that implies that spending is controlled by revenues… when it’s clearly not. That just means higher deficits, threatening a default of US Bonds, which is a worst case scenario for American prosperity.
- pupperino 1y agoI'm confident the people pursuing this mad agenda don't know the first thing about US budget laws and think they can just cut spending DOGE-style forever.
- pstuart 1y agoConsidering that the driver of all this is surrounded by yes-men and has spent his entire entitled life getting his way, I think their goal is to will it into being. And when it fails, blame the other party.