3 ms·
This is a good example of where AI will not take over. Wikipedia rabbitholes do not follow any pattern. To truly create an AI that guides you through Wikipedia
by INTPenis 1y ago
This is a good example of where AI will not take over.
Wikipedia rabbitholes do not follow any pattern. To truly create an AI that guides you through Wikipedia rabbithole you'd have to study thousands of humans going into actual rabbitholes, their clicks, and their reading patterns.
Otherwise it's just "let this AI take you on a journey you're not at all interested in".
- LiamPowell 1y agoAs I mentioned elsewhere in the thread, it's demonstrably not "AI-driven": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43923949 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43923949
- atulvi 1y agoOK, developer here. Here is how it works. It connects to groq and asks this "I was going in this rabbit hole of wikipedia articles: #{chain} \n I have now found these topics:\n\n#{related_topics}\n\n Select the 2 most mind blowing topics from the list and that I'd enjoy given my rabbit hole. Ensure two topics are not the same." and pics two articles that it returns. This is slightly better than random.(related article names are obtained from wikipedia API). Right now, I'm maxed on daily Groq usage and the app falls back to pure random choice. Why two articles? I was kind of going for a hot or not style system. Anyway, it was a fun experiment. Learned lots.