I don't think your comment is bizarre. I think the C.J.'s comment is bizarre. Talk about tipping your hand / biasing the case and disqualifying yourself. We

I don't think your comment is bizarre. I think the C.J.'s comment is bizarre. Talk about tipping your hand / biasing the case and disqualifying yourself. We agree. My argument for resentencing by a different judge is that the emotional impact of AI testimony is so strong as to be impossible to ignore, and hence disqualifying from judgement anyone exposed to it. It's one thing to say "disregard the evidence / testimony", it's quite another to exclude the evidence entirely.