3 ms·
Instagram 3.0 Bets Big On Geolocation With Photo Maps,
- ondrae 14y agoGoogle Maps huh? Millions of views a day. I wonder how much that is going to cost Facebook. Way more than rolling out their own service, I'm sure. People expect Gmaps though.
- glasshead969 14y agoI think Google maps API on iOS is free to use. Apple foots the bill for usage.
- hv23 14y agoIt's not free, it's just effectively free as long as you don't run up against Google Map's daily usage thresholds [1]. [1] http://www.techradar.com/us/news/applications/software/after-ios-6-snub-google-dramatically-slashes-price-of-google-maps-api-1086816 http://www.techradar.com/us/news/applications/software/after...
- untog 14y agoI doubt it'll cost them anything. Once iOS6 is released the iPhone won't be using GMaps, and I doubt Google will start charging for maps in apps if Apple doesn't. Good grief does Google need to update their mapping APIs, though.
- danudey 14y agoIt's just using the iOS maps. On iOS 5 and below, it's Google Maps; on iOS 6, it's Apple Maps.
- samstave 14y agoSo this is a mash up of the iPhones places view of my pictures and what Color.com was originally trying to do. Now we have a places photo-map of shared photos with the ability to filter stuff out... Sounds interesting, and surely they will be far more successful than color.com was... But I don't yet know how useful this will be. I am sure this will be mildly interesting for a long time... But it still doesn't solve my photo problem.
- subpixel 14y agoCare to be more specific about your problem? Most photos apps are more nice-to-have than must-have.
- jlarocco 14y ago> But it still doesn't solve my photo problem. Which is...?
- samstave 14y agoI take a ton of pictures on my phone, Right now I have 3,946 pics on my phone and just this morning I had to delete some so I could take more. I am not so interested in sharing the pics I take, though I do want that ability, but I need a superb way to organize the photos I take. For example, in the last week I have take nearly 100 photos. Some of them are work, some are my kids, some are interest shots. I like to keep them all - some I want to have in a gallery (Madeline wearing glasses and a wig), others I want to write more about, like blog, others I want to keep in a bucket hierarchy of pics I take about the work I am doing. I need a way to create these different buckets for my pics and choose for them to be public galleries, blog posts and categories. Frankly, I think this is an avenue that IMGUR could go down. I have been a premium subscriber to IMGUR since it was available - and I love having them as a dumping point. But managing the galleries is sort of a pain, and I cant blog etc... So, ultimately the company whom I feel is best suited to solve this problem for me is Dropbox. I have uploaded all 3,946 photos to dropbox via the camera upload feature - and I have a monthly gallery - but now I want to do more with them - I want to tag them (Show me all pics of Madeline), blog about them etc... So far - all the photo services provide me about 60% of what I really want. Ill never put photos in Facebook (I don't have an account and never will) and this is another reason I am not happy with Instagram... but overall its about the fact that I don't feel anyone has made the killer photo management service.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- amirmansour 14y agoTechcrunch title is not representative of the matter. How is this "betting big"? It is just and additional feature. What are they exactly betting here?
- chris-allnutt 14y agoAll I can think of is this: http://instaearth.me http://instaearth.me an app myself and another guy wrote at the last company I worked for. View all your Instagram photo's geo-located on a map. It's nice to see Instagram finally integrating it with the app.