Oh, yes, I missed that! You're correct. It's still more permissive than LGPL in that it isn't 'infectious' even when statically linked, the license only applie

Oh, yes, I missed that! You're correct. It's still more permissive than LGPL in that it isn't 'infectious' even when statically linked, the license only applies to the source file, not to any derived work. That makes the requirements more straightforward but does limit the freedom of the user to dynamically swap the library out for one that they'd prefer.