3 ms·
Doesn't MPL require to release any modifications made to the library itself?
by zigzag312 1y ago
Doesn't MPL require to release any modifications made to the library itself?
- lolinder 1y agoOh, yes, I missed that! You're correct. It's still more permissive than LGPL in that it isn't 'infectious' even when statically linked, the license only applies to the source file, not to any derived work. That makes the requirements more straightforward but does limit the freedom of the user to dynamically swap the library out for one that they'd prefer.
- kragen 1y agoNot if you put them in a new source code file, no.