> Pak terrorist infrastructure is not a military target Maybe we understand "military target" differently? Going by the Geneva Conventions: > In so far as obj

> Pak terrorist infrastructure is not a military target Maybe we understand "military target" differently? Going by the Geneva Conventions: > In so far as objects are concerned, military objectives are limited to those objects which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage. This is at least how I understand the term, and by that understanding, "terrorist infrastructure" could be considered legitimate military target. What understand of those terms do you have?