4 ms·

You can use anyhow, but yeah zig generally does errors better IMO

• ziml77 1y ago
  Errors are where I find zig severely lacking. They can't carry context. Like if you're parsing a JSON file and it fails, you can know that it failed but not where it failed within the file. Their solution in the standard library for cases like this was to handle printing to stderr internally, but that is incredibly hacky.
  • Cloudef 1y ago
    The std has diagnostics struct you can give to the json parser. Zig is manually memory managed language so it doesnt have payloads in errors for a good reason.
    • ziml77 1y ago
      Manual memory management is not a reason Zig couldn't have supported sum types for error returns. You don't need an allocator involved at all to return a discriminated union like Rust uses. I actually find Zig quite a pleasant language other than my gripe with not handling more complex errors as cleanly.
      • Cloudef 1y ago
        You would have to give up on global error set with sum types, unless you want to see the global error set bloat with the largest sum type. Also if the error payload needs allocating what are you gonna do? Allocating is no no no here. I know rust will just panic in OOM but zig chooses not to do that. Even if you allocated, since zig has no borrow checker the error handling becomes nightmare as you now have to deal with freeing the potential allocations. Using out parameters for context, or diagnostic pattern like std does is not bad at all imo. The only nice thing error payloads give you is better error messages in case of uncaught errors.