3 ms·
I think that it is simply because the situation is less problematic than with live events. In free countries, and especially the US when it comes to trade, the
by GuB-42 1y ago
I think that it is simply because the situation is less problematic than with live events.
In free countries, and especially the US when it comes to trade, the idea is that people can do whatever they want unless it causes a problem, and if it causes a problem, they will pass the minimum amount of regulation needed to address the problem.
My opinion as a consumer would be to ban all hidden fees in all industries, including taxes and tipping when it is expected. But lawmakers in the US consider it not enough of a problem to restrict the freedoms of businesses doing this, so they take a more targeted approach.
- LudwigNagasena 1y agoThat sounds more like a civil law vs common law distinction. In a civil law country if something causes a problem, the legislative branch would be expected to come up with a general solution. (eg https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/unfair-treatment/unfair-pricing/indexamp_en.htm https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/unfair-treat...) In a common law country, if something causes a problem an executive agency or a judge would be expected to figure out a solution that doesn’t set a precedent that is too wide and general.
- dboreham 1y agoCorruption makes it magically less of a problem.