It’s a fine enough journal entry, and I agree with the underlying sentiment of the piece, but can I crowdsource an explanation of the conclusive pith? > Learni

It’s a fine enough journal entry, and I agree with the underlying sentiment of the piece, but can I crowdsource an explanation of the conclusive pith? > Learning to learn is a noble idea. But more important is learning to unlearn, and knowing when to resist the comfort of automation. I feel strongly about “teaching people to teach themselves” which seems a direct analog to “learning to learn”, but I am at a complete loss for what “learning to unlearn” means, especially as it relates to resisting automation. Is the idea that you need to “unlearn” wanting to “learn” automation so you can keep “learning” more deeply about things you have already “learned”?