3 ms·
The C++ code implements the intended goal, not the problem TFA is trying to illustrate. Changing between: for (auto i : vec) and for (auto & i : vec
by PaulDavisThe1st 2y ago
The C++ code implements the intended goal, not the problem TFA is trying to illustrate.
Changing between:
for (auto i : vec)
and
for (auto & i : vec)
has essentially no bearing on what the author is trying to show. If they were focused on how move semantics are always important, they would not use an integer type.