3 ms·
That rule does not imply the inverse
by colecut 1y ago
That rule does not imply the inverse
- pixl97 1y agoI mean we have automated systems that 'write' things like tornado warnings. Would you rather we have someone hand write that out? It seems the initial rule seems rather worthless.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- colecut 1y ago1. I think the warnings are generally "written" by humans. Maybe some variables filled in during the automation. 2. So a rule with occasional exceptions is worthless, ok
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]