> Instead of merely spitting out text based on statistical models of probability, reasoning models break questions or tasks down into individual steps akin to a

> Instead of merely spitting out text based on statistical models of probability, reasoning models break questions or tasks down into individual steps akin to a human thought process. Uh huh, because they have the entire human brain all mapped out, and completely understand how consciousness works, and how it leads to the "human thought process". Sounds like o3 isn't the only thing hallucinating... If this is the case: > what's happening inside AI models is very different from how the models themselves described their "thought" What makes people think, that the way they think they think, is actually how they think? Post that one to your generative model and let's all laugh at the output...