4 ms·
Update 2: I've been using this model in both aider and cline and I've haven't gotten a diff matching error yet, even with some pretty difficult substitutions ac
by laborcontract 1y ago
Update 2: I've been using this model in both aider and cline and I've haven't gotten a diff matching error yet, even with some pretty difficult substitutions across different places in multiple files. The overall feel of this model is nice.
I don't have a formal benchmark but there's a notable improvement in code generation due to this alone.
I've had gemini chug away on plans that have taken ~1 hour to implement. (~80mln tokens spent) A good portion of that energy was spent fixing mistakes made by cline/aider/roo due to search/replace mistakes. If this model gets anywhere close to 100% on diffs then this is a BFD. I estimate this will translate to a 50-75% productivity boost on long context coding tasks. I hope the initial results i'm seeing hold up!
I'm surprised by the reaction in the rest of the thread. A lot unproductive complaining, a lot of off topic stuff, nothing talking about the model itself.
Any thoughts from anyone else using the updated model?
- esperent 1y agoHave you been using the Gemini 2.5 pro "Experimental" or "3-25" models in Cline? I've been using both over the last week and got quite a few diff errors, maybe 1/10 of edit so that 92% tracks for me. Does this 2.5 pro "Preview" feel like an improvement if you had used the others?
- laborcontract 1y agoYep i’ve been using the old and new models in cline. I can’t tell any difference outside of the improvement with diffs, but that’s good enough for me.
- vessenes 1y agoQuestion; are you calling it with “aider -model gemini”? And if so do you see 05-04 listed or the old one?