4 ms·

Didn't even have to click through to the report in question to know it would be all hallucinations -- both the original patchfile and the segfault ("ngtcp2_http

Didn't even have to click through to the report in question to know it would be all hallucinations -- both the original patchfile and the segfault ("ngtcp2_http3_handle_priority_frame".. "There is no function named like this in current ngtcp2 or nghttp3.") I guess these guys don't bother to verify, they just blast out AI slop and hope one of them hits?

indigodaddy 1y ago
Reminds me of when some LLM (might have been Deepseek) told me I could add wasm_mode=True in my FastHTML python code which would allow me to compile it to WebAssembly, when of course there is no such feature in FastHTML. This was even when I had provided it full llms-ctx.txt
- alabastervlog 1y ago
  I had Google's in-search "AI" invent a command line switch that would have been very helpful... if it existed. Complete with usage caveats and warnings! This was like two weeks ago. These things suck.
  - j_w 1y ago
    My favorite is when their in search "AI answer" hallucinates on the Golang standard lib. Always makes me happy to see.
    - hedora 1y ago
      You think that's funny? Try using AI help button in Google's office suite the next time you're trying to track down the right button to press.
  - sidewndr46 1y ago
    Isn't there a website that builds git man pages this way? By just stringing together random concepts into sentences that seem vaguely like something Git would implement. I thought it was silly and potentially harmful the first time I saw it. Apparently, it may have just been ahead of the curve.
    - parliament32 1y ago
      https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/ https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/
  - bigiain 1y ago
    <conspiracy theory> Google's internal version of that tool _does_ implement that command line switch...
spiffyk 1y ago
> I guess these guys don't bother to verify, they just blast out AI slop and hope one of them hits? Yes. Unfortunately, some companies seem to pay out the bug bounty without even verifying that the report is actually valid. This can be seen on the "reporter"'s profile: https://hackerone.com/evilginx https://hackerone.com/evilginx
pixl97 1y ago
>"ngtcp2_http3_handle_priority_frame" I wonder if you could use AI to classify the probability factor that something is AI bullshit and deprioritize it?
- pacifika 1y ago
  AI red tape.
soraminazuki 1y ago
Considering that even the reporter responded to requests for clarification with yet another AI slop, they likely lack the technical background.
- bigiain 1y ago
  "they likely lack the ethical background." FTFY

indigodaddy 1y ago

Reminds me of when some LLM (might have been Deepseek) told me I could add wasm_mode=True in my FastHTML python code which would allow me to compile it to WebAssembly, when of course there is no such feature in FastHTML. This was even when I had provided it full llms-ctx.txt

alabastervlog 1y ago
I had Google's in-search "AI" invent a command line switch that would have been very helpful... if it existed. Complete with usage caveats and warnings! This was like two weeks ago. These things suck.
- j_w 1y ago
  My favorite is when their in search "AI answer" hallucinates on the Golang standard lib. Always makes me happy to see.
  - hedora 1y ago
    You think that's funny? Try using AI help button in Google's office suite the next time you're trying to track down the right button to press.
- sidewndr46 1y ago
  Isn't there a website that builds git man pages this way? By just stringing together random concepts into sentences that seem vaguely like something Git would implement. I thought it was silly and potentially harmful the first time I saw it. Apparently, it may have just been ahead of the curve.
  - parliament32 1y ago
    https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/ https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/
- bigiain 1y ago
  <conspiracy theory> Google's internal version of that tool _does_ implement that command line switch...

spiffyk 1y ago

> I guess these guys don't bother to verify, they just blast out AI slop and hope one of them hits? Yes. Unfortunately, some companies seem to pay out the bug bounty without even verifying that the report is actually valid. This can be seen on the "reporter"'s profile: https://hackerone.com/evilginx https://hackerone.com/evilginx

pixl97 1y ago

>"ngtcp2_http3_handle_priority_frame" I wonder if you could use AI to classify the probability factor that something is AI bullshit and deprioritize it?

pacifika 1y ago
AI red tape.

soraminazuki 1y ago

Considering that even the reporter responded to requests for clarification with yet another AI slop, they likely lack the technical background.

bigiain 1y ago
"they likely lack the ethical background." FTFY