3 ms·
I am not sure you are interpreting the map correctly. The red-brown tones are less-dreary, while bright red is more-dreary. L.A. is squarely in the less-dreary
by anthomtb 1y ago
I am not sure you are interpreting the map correctly. The red-brown tones are less-dreary, while bright red is more-dreary. L.A. is squarely in the less-dreary area. See also the numerical rankings.
Your point stands though. L.A. is one fugly city.
- madcaptenor 1y agoIt's harder to throw together an index of fugliness based on public data, though.
- anthomtb 1y agoActually, this sounds like a great use for an LLM or even boring old machine classification. I am sure Prague and Beautiful are commonly found a few tokens apart in a training set of say, TripAdvisor forums. While "LA"/"Los Angeles" and "ugly" are likely to be similarly co-located.
- DidYaWipe 1y agoI'd hope so. Just the other day I saw tourists trudging around on Hollywood Boulevard, which is a major shithole. I thought that I can't believe these people aren't deeply disappointed but afraid to admit it.
- DidYaWipe 1y agoI didn't make any attempt to interpret it correctly. I saw a map purporting to measure dreariness, and on it a lot of red around L.A. Given that red usually connotes "the most of" whatever the map is supposed to show, it struck me as consistent with my experience.