I get both sides of this debate. However, claiming llama is not a 'substantial transformation' of the information used to build it seems untennable. The compl

I get both sides of this debate. However, claiming llama is not a 'substantial transformation' of the information used to build it seems untennable. The complaint feels to me more like the paint factory claiming rights to the paintings you created with it's paint, rather than a classic pirate DVD copier that just resells copies. Maybe a midway could be some Google Books like solution where you can still find anything but where the output is restricted to just substantial fragments and not complete verbatim chapters? I do not believe people use llama to 'read published books on the cheap'.