But it is unknown if the current version was modified to do so. As the name "TM SGNL" looks shortened to fit after hex editing the app. This can all have been a

But it is unknown if the current version was modified to do so. As the name "TM SGNL" looks shortened to fit after hex editing the app. This can all have been achieved by library overloads etc. > One line This can also be a single JMP and RTS statement, to a function that makes a screenshot, or something that takes the message. No technical analysis of a working application has been performed. Just speculation of how this could work. I am not saying Micah is wrong. I just hoped more was available, so an actual disassemble was possible. I would speculate that they did not recompile from source, but used the same process as used by the other applications. Intrusive by modification of the code execution, by injection, etc. That is speculation from my end, but reuses similar approaches across all of their applications.