3 ms·
>Recently, we also trained an experimental social model which was well received by our community. However, this was not trained on Discord API data. In fact, we
by b0a04gl 1y ago
>Recently, we also trained an experimental social model which was well received by our community. However, this was not trained on Discord API data. In fact, we would have no use of such data. Shapes have exchanged millions of messages through our website, through X, through email and other experimental integrations. We used a small anonymised dataset of prompts between users and shapes on these non-Discord platforms to train this model. We have always used Discord's API data as directed by users, to enable interactions with their Shapes.
not sure what's meant here? so you meant you used data collected from other platforms to train model but not discord one? if so why is that even valid coz you confirm that most of users traffic from discord. it would be more better off if you've released detailed research paper to cover the details of how you anonymised the data no matter what platform you took the data. what if someother integration platforms you mentioned above wanted to sue shapes again?
- matthewsh 1y agoValid point tbh, if they said they were training off of data and never explicitly stated what data sources they were using then Discord should be concerned of that violation. Would also love to see that announcement from them about it. If the announcement was made in Discord then that only solidifies the reason for Discord to be concerned.
- typeofhuman 1y agoApparently Shapes, Inc. requires you to submit your application token. This is a violation of section 2D, Discord Developer TOS. https://support-dev.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/8562894815383-Discord-Developer-Terms-of-Service https://support-dev.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/8562894815...