3 ms·
Perhaps so, but in the expansive definition you're using, even an in-memory binary tree qualifies as a database, which makes your point meaningless.
by foobiekr 1y ago
Perhaps so, but in the expansive definition you're using, even an in-memory binary tree qualifies as a database, which makes your point meaningless.
- Ericson2314 1y agoI'm OK including that — tmpfs is similar, but we can easily exclude that by requiring persistence. The intentional definition doesn't need to be expansive the point of being useless!
- aforwardslash 1y agoNitpick: An in-memory hash table can be a filesystem :)