Such a literal interpretation isn't reasonable. There are all sorts of patterns that can be indirectly leaked through supposedly unrelated data. Yet FOIA exists

Such a literal interpretation isn't reasonable. There are all sorts of patterns that can be indirectly leaked through supposedly unrelated data. Yet FOIA exists and is obviously intended to be useful. So obviously there must be some threshold for the value to an attacker. He attempted to communicate that schemas are clearly below such a threshold and they used his wording to attempt to argue the opposite.