3 ms·
Correct, but nobody turns it on because it’s opt in, and even if you turn it on, 100% of your iMessages will still be escrowed in a form readable to Apple due t
by sneak 2y ago
Correct, but nobody turns it on because it’s opt in, and even if you turn it on, 100% of your iMessages will still be escrowed in a form
readable to Apple due to the fact that the other ends of your iMessage conversations won’t have ADP enabled because it’s off by default.
Again, Apple gets to say “we have e2ee, any user who wants it can turn it on” and the FBI gets to read 100% of the texts in the country unimpeded.
If Apple really wanted to promote privacy, they’d have deployed the so-called “trust circle” system they designed and implemented which allowed a quorum of trusted contacts to use their own keys to allow you to recover your account e2ee keys without Apple being able to access it, rolled that out, and then slowly migrated their entire user base over to e2ee backups.
They have not, and they will not, because that will compromise the surveillance backdoor, and get them regulated upon, or worse. The current administration has already shown that they are willing to impose insanely steep tariffs on the iPhone.
You can’t fight city hall, you don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows, etc. The US intelligence community has a heart attack gun. Tim Apple does not.
Separately it is an interesting aside that Apple’s 1A rights are being violated here by the presumptive retaliation should they publish such a migration feature (software code being protected speech).
- immibis 2y agoAnd yet, it's somehow so effective that it's illegal in the UK because it doesn't let the government read everyone's messages.
- Terr_ 2y agoTBF, governments trying to outlaw some kind of privacy doesn't necessarily mean it's a current impediment to them. They can be planning ahead, securing their position, or just trying to move the window of what is considered acceptable.