4 ms·
Not particularly relevant to the core article, but just a dumb thought re: the LSP/LS annoyance mentioned in the intro. I think maybe some of it stems from 'ls
by wormius 1y ago
Not particularly relevant to the core article, but just a dumb thought re: the LSP/LS annoyance mentioned in the intro.
I think maybe some of it stems from 'ls' the command. If I saw something called py-ls instead of py-lsp, I may think it's a python based ls command. "Name Collision" as it were.
Anyways off to read the rest of the article...
- ogoffart 1y agoI wrote a language server too, and I also went with "-lsp" naming because it's way more recognizable. "LSP" is kind of a brand. If you look at the list at https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/implementors/servers/ https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/impleme... a lot of them are named -lsp.