4 ms·

Thanks, I appreciate the feedback. I think the reason you tend to see these same kinds of problems across tools is that you are running up against the reasonin

Thanks, I appreciate the feedback. I think the reason you tend to see these same kinds of problems across tools is that you are running up against the reasoning limitations of the underlying models. I see my goal as trying to push that horizon out as far possible, and I think Plandex pushes it significantly farther than most other tools, but you do of course still run into those limitations. That said, I think even setting aside improvements to the underlying models, there's a lot of potential to improve on these issues. I think they're all basically addressable at current capability levels, though they are difficult problems. It's what I'm personally most excited to work on.

kristopolous 1y ago
Honestly, I think it simply becomes the wrong modality at a certain level of engagement with any problem. When human developing a project successfully you engage in different collective behaviors throughout the process. That's why the scrum/agile stuff that tries to normalize it doesn't actually work very well. On computers, relationships are workflows and you need to do a dance of fluid relationships to use AI effectively throughout the execution process - otherwise that's why you either abandon it after you get to some point or you feel like you're just wasting time.
- danenania 1y ago
  You're right. I think the solution essentially boils down to modeling those other modalities and incorporating them into the agent.