The last excerpt is key: copies are things by which something can be reproduced even with the aid of a machine. Can you get the LLM to reproduce the work? If y

The last excerpt is key: copies are things by which something can be reproduced even with the aid of a machine. Can you get the LLM to reproduce the work? If yes, that would be a copy. On the point of what Zuck did, The law states what is prohibited and what exceptions are made against the prohibition, not necessarily what is permitted. If the work cannot be reproduced, then it is not a copy. As for the cinema part, an argument can be made that the person conspired to reproduce the work. And rule declarations are made that you can’t use video recording device in the theater.