> Our mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI) benefits all of humanity. Then why is it paywalled? Why are you making/have made people a

> Our mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI) benefits all of humanity. Then why is it paywalled? Why are you making/have made people across the world sift through the worst material on offer by the wide uncensored Internet to train your LLMs? Why do you have a for-profit LLC operating under a non-profit, or for that matter, a "Public Benefit Corporation" that has to answer to shareholders at all? Related to that: > or the needs for hundreds of billions of dollars of compute to train models and serve users. How does that serve humanity? Redirecting billions of dollars to fancy autocomplete who's power demands strain already struggling electrical grids and offset the gains of green energy worldwide? > A lot of people around OpenAI in the early days thought AI should only be in the hands of a few trusted people who could “handle it”. No, we thought your plagiarism machine was a disgusting abuse of the public square, and to be clear, this criticism would've been easily handled by simply requesting people opt-in to have their material used for AI training. But we all know why you didn't do that, don't we Sam. > It will of course not be all used for good, but we trust humanity and think the good will outweigh the bad by orders of magnitude. Well so far, we've got vulnerable, lonely people being scammed on Facebook, we've got companies charging subscriptions for people to sext their chatbots, we've got various states using it to target their opposition for military intervention, and the White House may have used it to draft the dumbest basis for a trade war in human history. Oh and fake therapists too. When's the good kick in? > We believe this is the best path forward—AGI should enable all of humanity^1 to benefit each other. ^1 who subscribe to our services