3 ms·

OK, so we name it something different, you transform inputs into smaller outputs. If I make a script without AI that transforms someones poems without permissi

OK, so we name it something different, you transform inputs into smaller outputs. If I make a script without AI that transforms someones poems without permission so sometimes it outputs the exact poems but sometimes it does it wrong, when is my script fair to use and when what I did is illegal. say my script contains words and matrixes of numbers the original poems are not directly inside, the script transformed them into vectors. maybe even simpler, I create a zip format where I randomly replace words with their synonym, or group of words with something equivalent. Would you defend this as original ? why my random transformations are not original while mathematical transformations you will defend ? And how can you suggest putting output filters to protect only the giants for copyright and everyone else gets screwed.

Workaccount2 1y ago
YouTube actively filters small channel copied content too. We should be building robust copyright filters and everyone should be able to contribute their work to it. but that is a different issue than whether or not an LLM is legally allowed to view a work that is publicly available. Again, pretty much every artist is capable of off-hand copyright violation on the spot. This has been true forever. We don't bar them from seeing art to prevent this.
- simion314 1y ago
  >but that is a different issue than whether or not an LLM is legally allowed to view a work that is publicly available. We are not talking about the scenario where LLM does a web search and "transforms" your blog as a response to a user prompt. We are talking about people writing code to torrent content, including copyrighted content as books and newspaper articles then this same people create soem software/script/blackbox and they put this copyrighted stuff inside and this same people also put a filter in the output to attempt and block SOME of the copyrighted material to be spitted out(they did it for Dune, Harry Poter , probably other popular stuff but for sure they did not done it for Romanian copyrighted material or some small writer). If I publish a poem I do not give implicit permission to anyone to use it as they see fit, and have scripts/software/backboxes train on it and spit parts of my poem out.

Workaccount2 1y ago

YouTube actively filters small channel copied content too. We should be building robust copyright filters and everyone should be able to contribute their work to it. but that is a different issue than whether or not an LLM is legally allowed to view a work that is publicly available. Again, pretty much every artist is capable of off-hand copyright violation on the spot. This has been true forever. We don't bar them from seeing art to prevent this.

simion314 1y ago
>but that is a different issue than whether or not an LLM is legally allowed to view a work that is publicly available. We are not talking about the scenario where LLM does a web search and "transforms" your blog as a response to a user prompt. We are talking about people writing code to torrent content, including copyrighted content as books and newspaper articles then this same people create soem software/script/blackbox and they put this copyrighted stuff inside and this same people also put a filter in the output to attempt and block SOME of the copyrighted material to be spitted out(they did it for Dune, Harry Poter , probably other popular stuff but for sure they did not done it for Romanian copyrighted material or some small writer). If I publish a poem I do not give implicit permission to anyone to use it as they see fit, and have scripts/software/backboxes train on it and spit parts of my poem out.