4 ms·
Let's assume (bad assumption, but it should be good enough for the math) that a Happy Meal™®© is a decent meal. It costs about $6 around here, so let's say wit
by bombcar 2y ago
Let's assume (bad assumption, but it should be good enough for the math) that a Happy Meal™®© is a decent meal.
It costs about $6 around here, so let's say without toy it's $5.
https://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/tables/pop1.asp https://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/tables/pop1.asp says there are 71 million kids.
$466 billion a year.
Ok, ok, that is maybe too high. Let's assume a wonderful world where you can produce a meal for a dollar (less than the local school district).
$77 billion a year.
- frakt0x90 2y agoThe price you pay at the kiosk is not the cost of production.
- bombcar 2y agoWhich is why I calculated an upper and lower bound. It's hard to argue it would be MORE expensive than McDonalds-for-all and hard to argue it would be much cheaper than a buck-o-meal.
- ryoshoe 2y agoBased those calculations every child could be fed for less than 10% of the DoD's annual budget of $849.8 billion. https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3703410/department-of-defense-releases-the-presidents-fiscal-year-2025-defense-budget https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/370341...
- bombcar 2y agoApparently in 2022 the school lunch portion of the federal budget was $29 billion.
- airforce1 2y agoYeah but we currently have a $2T deficit. We could do all sorts of good for "less than 10% of the DoD's annual budget", but we are already spending far more money than we bring in. The DoD's budget needs to be reduced by like 50% (along with a lot of other departments/programs) to have even a hope of getting debt under control, let alone introducing new "think of the children" expenses
- vharuck 2y agoIf a school lunch is served for free, then parents who would have bought that lunch now get to keep the money. If we would raise taxes to fund these programs, it's possible the majority of people could actually save money.
- bombcar 2y agoNothing else changing, the families who were paying for lunch would come out ahead (they lose the expense, but taxes are over EVERYONE, and most people don't have school-aged children).
- Suppafly 2y ago>It costs about $6 around here, so let's say without toy it's $5. Sure but half of that is profit, so it's a silly thing to even mention. If you are using bad faith exams intentionally, it's a good sign that your comment is being made in bad faith. >$77 billion a year. I'm not sure you how go to 77 billion from 71 million kids, but whatever, if that's what it costs we should do it.