3 ms·
>Because cruelty is the point for some people. It's not the people peddling cruelty, it's the system. Though obviously people who personally are ok with or li
by potato3732842 2y ago
>Because cruelty is the point for some people.
It's not the people peddling cruelty, it's the system. Though obviously people who personally are ok with or like that will be better represented in such a system.
> Or said in their parlance, it teaches you self reliance or to pull yourself up by your bootstraps.
Rephrased another way you're basically saying "it's not my team doing that, it's the other team." And this is exactly the kind of divisive garbage that perpetuates the system.
What these systems teach in practice is "don't you dare step an inch out of line, no, intent doesn't matter, out of line is out of line and will be punished" which in a perverse way is exactly the kind of thing government schools will wind up teaching because every bit you make those future adults more likely to comply will pay dividends in reduced enforcement over their lives. Support for that sort of crap generally crosses party lines, as does opposition.
- mschuster91 2y ago> It's not the people peddling cruelty, it's the system. The rules of the system are made by people. And yes, for quite some of them the cruelty is the point when making the rules.
- ryandrake 2y agoThat's right. "The system" didn't just appear out of nowhere. It's built by people--increasingly built by people who believe the government should be used as a tool to exact cruelty and humiliation on outgroups they don't like.
- apercu 2y ago> It's not the people peddling cruelty, it's the system. I'd argue that recent elections demonstrate enough of the people _are_ voting cruelty.