7 ms·
By “protect” you mean “roll back to the 1950’s”, righ? Because Hollywood today was doing quite well and I don’t think I’ve heard a single industry source asking
by brookst 2y ago
By “protect” you mean “roll back to the 1950’s”, righ? Because Hollywood today was doing quite well and I don’t think I’ve heard a single industry source asking for this.
IMO the other shoe here is stronger content restrictions and more government control of what gets made. Easier to do that with US productions, hence the attempt to make everything distributed in the US a US production.
- jparishy 2y agoWho isn't asking for something to bring more production home? Studio execs? People in LA, ATL, etc want to work, and every year there is less and less jobs below the line in the US, even though there's more productions overall paid for by US companies. This sentiment you're talking about is at least not universal
- watwut 2y agoI have hear actors complain about AI, I have heard various guilds striking over about dozens of causes ... moving abroad was not one of them.
- jparishy 2y agoThen you might be missing it as it’s a huge huge issue for below the line workers (actors are part of the package we’re shipping out to other countries)
- Hard_Space 2y ago>Because Hollywood today was doing quite well and I don’t think I’ve heard a single industry source asking for this. Unless the new edict excludes farming out VFX. The VFX industry has been on its knees for years now, in a race to the bottom that has made r/vfx a pretty depressing place. (Source: Spent the last few years working for a well-known VFX company)