3 ms·

In the sense "important privacy laws" does not imply pro-privacy?

• 7bit 1y ago
  No, it means that privacy on cryptocurrency is the major driver of corruptions and tax fraud, and it's important to remove any privacy around these topics. Want to stay private, there always FIAT currency, which protects your privacy (until you reach certain amounts of transactions).
  • rightbyte 1y ago
    No matter the justifications banning anonymous accounts is not pro-privacy. Also, Chat control has almost been passed twice by now.
    • 7bit 1y ago
      He said it's an important privacy law. Not that it's a pro-privacy law. Only you said that.