3 ms·
Scale is the one thing stereo doesn't get you compared with sequential mono images, unless you have some fancy lens model that lets you derive scale from nonlin
by taneq 1y ago
Scale is the one thing stereo doesn't get you compared with sequential mono images, unless you have some fancy lens model that lets you derive scale from nonlinearities in the lens. Is that something we do now? I always wanted to try out monocular SLAM with a fisheye lens.
- Jyaif 1y agoWith 2 mono images you can figure out that an object is twice as big as an other, but you can't tell the size of any objects (= you don't know the scale). With a stereo image you know the distance between the lenses, which allows you to know the size of the objects (= you know the scale).