I don't think machines should rely on an opaque logic to assume and "correct errors" on user input. It's more accurate to "fail" than handling out an assumed ou

I don't think machines should rely on an opaque logic to assume and "correct errors" on user input. It's more accurate to "fail" than handling out an assumed output. And also: > they need to supply ones specifically engineered to be uncorrelated with the right figures. I assume most people will understand this way (including me) when it's said to "input wrong figures".