> But here’s the catch: you’re missing some edge cases. What about negative inputs? The docstring literally says it only works with positive integers, and the

> But here’s the catch: you’re missing some edge cases. What about negative inputs? The docstring literally says it only works with positive integers, and the LLM is supposed to follow the docstring (per previous assertions). > The problem is that traditional tests can only cover a narrow slice of your function’s behavior. Property tests? Fuzzers? Symbolic execution? > Just because a high percentage of tests pass doesn’t mean your code is bug-free. Neither does this thing. If you want your code to be bug-free what you're looking for is a proof assistant not vibe-reviewing. Also > One of the reasons to use suite is its seamless integration with pytest. Exposing a predicate is not "seamless integration with pytest", it's just exposing a predicate.