3 ms·
Considering AI is trained on the average human experience, I have a hard time believing it would be able to make any significant difference in this area. The be
by Zebfross 2y ago
Considering AI is trained on the average human experience, I have a hard time believing it would be able to make any significant difference in this area. The best experience I’ve had debugging at this level was using Microsoft’s time travel debugger which allows stepping forward and back.
- voidspark 2y agoIt can analyze a crash dump in 2 seconds, that could take hours for an experienced developer, or impossible for the "average human".
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- userbinator 2y ago[flagged]
- posnet 2y agoMedian
- spacechild1 2y agoHuman intelligence roughly follows a normal distribution where the median is the same as the mean. In that sense OP was correct that half of the population are below average.
- danb1974 2y agoThat's not how averages work :)
- FirmwareBurner 2y agoYes, but we all understood the essence of what he meant and he's right. Why be a stickler about it.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- userbinator 2y ago[flagged]
- hhh 2y agoIs it brigading if people just have the opinion that AI can do well at software?
- userbinator 2y agoOnly half of them.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- cjbprime 2y agoYou should try AI sometime. It's quite good, and can do things (like "analyze these 10000 functions and summarize what you found out about how this binary works, including adding comments everywhere) that individual humans do not scale to.
- _i60b 2y agoGeorge Hotz's Qira is a timeless debugger; worth checking out too!