I don't understand the need to come up with some fancy niche (slavery, oral, food name) when you have the more common approach: as is usual, part of the army ra

I don't understand the need to come up with some fancy niche (slavery, oral, food name) when you have the more common approach: as is usual, part of the army ran away, and it included people of all ranks, from soldiers to generals, and they recorded it in all the same ways all the other events for recorded in the same sources (including training guides) Then you continue to ignore the other elephant - the soldiers and everyone else who won battles also record history avoiding the slavery/food route And again, "massacre" doesn't mean 100%